Beginning on April 1, 2018, employers must comply with the newly-enacted Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“MPWFA”), which prohibits employers from discriminating against, ring, or refusing to hire a person due to pregnancy or pregnancy-related conditions.
Massachusetts businesses and their owners are by now familiar with the rule that General Laws chapter 93A, a statute that bars unfair competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices and provides for the possibility of double or triple damages plus attorneys’ fees, is inapplicable to intra-corporate and employment disputes. But could a claim under chapter 93A be brought against an outsider who aids and abets an insider’s breach of fiduciary duties? Read our newsletter for more information.
Laredo & Smith offers clients big-firm expertise with the client-centered, cost-effective strategy that only a small firm can offer.
- If You Want Your Attorney’s Fees and Costs of Litigation, Make Sure Your Contract Clearly Calls for ItOctober 5, 2022 - 3:24 pm
- Dot Your I’s and Cross Your T’s Before Terminating an EmployeeJune 27, 2022 - 11:20 am
- Employers Cannot Terminate Employees Merely For Filing a Rebuttal in Their Personnel FileFebruary 9, 2022 - 5:08 pm
- Domestic Violence Leave Statute Allows Time Off for Brand New EmployeesOctober 22, 2021 - 9:26 am
Laredo & Smith, LLP
101 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110